Register now and start:
- Accessing PAR Training
- Shopping PAR products & tools
- Using online assessments with PARiConnect
Artificial intelligence (AI) is everywhere these days, and not every instance is easy to spot. From images you see on social media to reports you review at work, it’s getting harder and harder to determine what is crafted by AI compared to what isn’t. This brings up a bevy of concerns regarding the ethical use of AI, particularly in fields like psychology where confidentiality and accuracy are imperative. After all, even the most advanced platform can still make mistakes, provide false information as facts, or use what you provide it in non-compliant ways.
With that said, AI still has its benefits. When used properly as an assistive tool, this technology can help you streamline your workload, organize information, and save time that could be better spent elsewhere. This is especially helpful for psychologists, as manual scoring and other administrative tasks can eat up time that would otherwise be spent with clients, students, or patients.
AI is a powerful tool—but only when used responsibly. In this blog, we’ll dive into the concerns for psychologists using AI, how it can be used ethically, the guidelines and guardrails around its use, and the benefits of using it correctly.
Artificial intelligence refers to a machine’s ability to perform the cognitive functions typically associated with human minds, such as learning, reasoning, perceiving, and interacting. While AI was once viewed as something out of a Sci-Fi film, in reality it’s been helping humans with their day-to-day tasks for some time. For example, many of us use Siri to help us send a text, change a song, or map to a certain location. The same goes for the use of an Alexa or Google home device, as well as curated social media content, text predictions, facial identification, and even language translation.
Nowadays, AI is used in virtually any context or setting. With the advancements of AI-powered chatbots, platforms, and technologies, it would be difficult to go a day without consuming some type of content that was not generated or assisted by AI. When used in certain applications, AI can help professionals in a variety of fields by boosting their creativity, generating content outlines, analyzing data, summarizing meetings, and more.
When it comes to applying AI to psychological settings, the potential is both exciting and transformative. AI can assist psychologists by automating time-consuming administrative tasks such as scoring assessments, generating preliminary reports, and managing appointment scheduling. These efficiencies allow clinicians to redirect their focus toward more meaningful client interactions and clinical decision-making. For example, AI-powered platforms can help identify patterns in assessment data or flag inconsistencies that may warrant further review—supporting, rather than replacing, the clinician’s expertise.
Moreover, AI can support research efforts by rapidly synthesizing data, summarizing findings, and even suggesting relevant studies based on a psychologist’s area of interest. In educational settings, AI tools can help instructors tailor content to student needs or provide real-time feedback on assignments. However, while these capabilities are promising, they must be implemented with caution. The use of AI in psychology must always prioritize ethical standards, client confidentiality, and compliance with professional guidelines to ensure that the technology enhances—rather than compromises—the quality of care.
As AI becomes more integrated into psychological practice, it’s essential to recognize that convenience should never come at the cost of ethics. Psychologists are bound by strict professional codes that prioritize client confidentiality, informed consent, and the responsible use of tools and data. While AI can be a powerful ally, it also introduces new risks that must be carefully managed. When it comes to this subject, each of the following must be carefully considered:
One of the most pressing concerns is the protection of sensitive client information. Many popular AI platforms—especially those that are free or publicly available—store user inputs to train their models. This means that entering client data into these tools, even for seemingly harmless tasks like summarizing notes, could result in a serious breach of confidentiality. Psychologists must ensure that any AI tool they use is compliant with HIPAA, FERPA, or other relevant privacy regulations, and that it has been vetted for secure data handling.
AI systems are only as good as the data they’re trained on. If that data contains biases—whether cultural, racial, or diagnostic—those biases can be perpetuated or even amplified by the AI. This is particularly dangerous in psychological contexts, where misinterpretation of data can lead to inappropriate recommendations or interventions. Psychologists must remain vigilant, using AI as a support tool rather than a decision-maker and always reviewing information with a critical eye.
Another ethical challenge is the “black box” nature of many AI systems. If a psychologist cannot explain how an AI tool arrived at a particular conclusion, it becomes difficult to justify its use in clinical documentation or decision-making. Ethical practice requires transparency—not only in how tools are used, but also in how their outputs are interpreted and communicated to clients.
Clients have a right to know when AI is being used in their care. Psychologists should disclose the role of AI tools in assessments or interventions and explain their limitations. This fosters trust and ensures that clients remain active participants in their own treatment. Ultimately, the responsibility for ethical practice lies with the clinician—not the tool.
While the potential of AI in psychology is vast, its benefits can only be realized when used responsibly. Ethical AI use isn’t just about what the technology can do, it’s about how, when, and why it’s used. For psychologists, this means applying the same care and scrutiny to AI tools as they would to any other clinical instrument. To use AI ethically, psychologists should:
Not all AI tools are created equal. Public-facing platforms like ChatGPT, Google Bard, or other generative AI tools may be convenient, but they are not designed for handling protected health information (PHI). These platforms often store user inputs to improve their models, which can lead to unintended data exposure.
Psychologists should only use AI tools that are explicitly designed for clinical or educational use and that comply with HIPAA, FERPA, or other relevant privacy standards. For example, platforms developed by trusted and certified vendors are built with these safeguards in mind.
AI should never replace clinical judgment. Instead, it should serve as a support system—offering suggestions, surfacing patterns, or automating routine tasks. Psychologists must remain the final decision-makers, reviewing AI-generated content for accuracy, relevance, and appropriateness. This is especially important when interpreting assessment results or drafting reports, where nuance and context are critical.
The ethical landscape of AI is evolving rapidly. Psychologists should stay informed about emerging guidelines from professional organizations like the American Psychological Association (APA), the National Association of School Psychologists (NASP), and others. These bodies are actively developing frameworks to guide the responsible use of AI in clinical and educational settings. Until formal standards are finalized, clinicians should rely on existing ethical codes, institutional policies, and their own professional judgment.
With ethical considerations in mind, AI can still offer numerous practical benefits when used responsibly. For psychologists, time is one of the most valuable resources—and AI can help reclaim it. Here are some of the most impactful ways AI is already helping professionals in the field of psychology save time without compromising quality or care:
As artificial intelligence continues to evolve, so too does the conversation around its ethical and effective use in psychology. Recent sessions from PARtalks, such as “Navigating the Ethical Landscape: Exploring AI in School Psychology,” have brought these issues to the forefront, highlighting the growing demand for and interest in tools that are both time-saving and compliant.